image
image
user-login
arrow
PAPPI DI HATTI MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. MOHIT NAYYAR & MRS. SHIVANI NAYYAR
P

PAPPI DI HATTI
MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. MOHIT NAYYAR & MRS. SHIVANI NAYYAR

PAPPI DI HATTI is a Trademark filed on Jun 24, 2015 in through IP Office.The Trademark is registered to MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. MOHIT NAYYAR & MRS. SHIVANI NAYYAR and was filed by attorney.

P

PAPPI DI HATTI MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. MOHIT NAYYAR & MRS. SHIVANI NAYYAR Trademark Information

Application ID

2993961

Status

Objected

Date of Application

Jun 24, 2015

Classes

35

Proprietor(s)

MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. MOHIT NAYYAR & MRS. SHIVANI NAYYAR

Used Since

01/04/1967

FAQs

The application for PAPPI DI HATTI was made on Jun 24, 2015
The trademark applicant for PAPPI DI HATTI is MR. RAKESH KUMAR, MR. MOHIT NAYYAR & MRS. SHIVANI NAYYAR.
Trademark application has been filed under the class(es) 35.
As per IP India, trademark application is on the following stage: Objected.
Listed application Id of PAPPI DI HATTI is 2993961.
PAPPI DI HATTI Trademark is a undefined mark.
Disclaimer: Vakilsearch assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this page. The data is derived from mca.gov.in and ipindia.gov.in
bulb
Don’t lose your brand like ”
Our experts are here to assist you in finding a similar trademark.
  • No results found
1 Lakh+
TM Registered since 2011
trademark
star
4.5/5
(19k+ reviews)
google

footer-service

By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.