image
image
user-login
arrow
BIJAY DILIP DUTTA
B

BIJAY
DILIP DUTTA

BIJAY is a Trademark filed on Sept 02, 1992 in through IP Office.The Trademark is registered to DILIP DUTTA and was filed by attorney.

B

BIJAY DILIP DUTTA Trademark Information

Application ID

580308

Status

Abandoned

Date of Application

Sept 02, 1992

Classes

9

Proprietor(s)

DILIP DUTTA

Related trademark

BIJAY NILIMA SARKAR

Abandoned

Class -9
BIJAY RABINDRANATH KONER

Abandoned

Class -7
BIJAY BIJAY KUMAR BEHERA.

Abandoned

Class -34
BIJAY (1) RAM LAGAN JAISWALTrading As : AJAY BATTERY INDUSTRIESSingle Firm

Removed

Class -9
BIJAY URMIN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,

Registered

Class -34
BIJAY SHIV SHANKAR

Objected

Class -30

FAQs

The application for BIJAY was made on Sept 02, 1992
The trademark applicant for BIJAY is DILIP DUTTA.
Trademark application has been filed under the class(es) 9.
As per IP India, trademark application is on the following stage: Abandoned.
Listed application Id of BIJAY is 580308.
BIJAY Trademark is a undefined mark.
Disclaimer: Vakilsearch assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this page. The data is derived from mca.gov.in and ipindia.gov.in
bulb
Don’t lose your brand like ”
Our experts are here to assist you in finding a similar trademark.
  • No results found
1 Lakh+
TM Registered since 2011
trademark
star
4.5/5
(19k+ reviews)
google

footer-service

By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.